AI legislation affecting Indiana healthcare organizations
Indiana healthcare organizations face growing AI regulation at both the federal and state level. Bills in Congress and the Indiana General Assembly address AI-assisted diagnostics, clinical decision support, patient data privacy, telehealth, pharmaceutical research, and medical device software. Whether you operate a hospital system in Indianapolis, a clinic in Fort Wayne, or a telehealth platform serving Indiana patients, these bills could create new compliance requirements.
147
Bills Affecting Indiana Healthcare
49
High Risk
Key Compliance Considerations
Indiana providers using AI-assisted diagnostic tools may need to disclose AI involvement to patients under proposed state and federal legislation
Clinical decision support systems used in Indiana hospitals face new validation and testing requirements in multiple pending bills
Patient data used to train AI models has stricter consent and de-identification rules under both federal proposals and Indiana data governance bills
Telehealth AI serving Indiana patients must meet the same standard-of-care requirements as in-person care under proposed regulation
AI Bills Affecting Indiana Healthcare
HR 9734
Rep. Herbert Conaway (D-NJ) introduced this bill to restrict how Medicare Advantage plans use AI to deny prior authorization requests. It would require human clinician review of AI-flagged denials and set new transparency and oversight rules for insurers using algorithms to approve or reject care.
Last action: Jul 16, 2026
HR 6461
Representative Ted Lieu introduced the READ AI Models Act (HR 6461) to require companies developing powerful AI systems to run safety tests and share the results with the government. The bill specifically targets frontier AI models (think GPT-4 level and beyond) and would force developers to test for dangerous capabilities like cyberattacks, bioweapon design, or autonomous replication before release.
Last action: Jun 25, 2026
HB 3494
Illinois HB 3494, introduced by Rep. Mary Beth Canty and a large group of Democratic co-sponsors, creates a new Health Data Privacy Act regulating how companies collect, use, and share consumer health data. While the bill text is sparse in the summary provided, similar state laws (like Washington's My Health My Data Act) typically restrict AI-driven health data processing, require explicit consumer consent, and ban the sale of health information without authorization.
Last action: May 30, 2026
SB 3114
Illinois SB 3114, introduced by Sen. Dave Koehler with broad bipartisan support, would require health insurers to disclose when they use AI or algorithms to 'downcode' medical claims (paying providers less than what was billed by reassigning codes). Insurers would have to explain the downcoding decision, identify whether AI was involved, and give providers a way to appeal.
Last action: May 27, 2026
SB 3384
Illinois SB 3384, introduced by Senators Laura Ellman and Rachel Ventura, would regulate 'AI companion' products (chatbots and virtual companions designed for ongoing emotional or social interaction with users). The bill aims to set safety standards for these systems, particularly to protect minors and vulnerable users from harm linked to parasocial AI relationships.
Last action: May 25, 2026
SB 3502
Illinois SB 3502 would make AI developers and deployers legally liable when their products cause harm, treating AI systems similarly to defective physical products. Companies could be sued for damages caused by their AI, with liability potentially extending across the development and deployment chain.
Last action: May 22, 2026
SB 3590
Illinois SB 3590, the AI Product Liability Act, would make AI developers and deployers legally liable when their AI systems cause harm to users or third parties. The bill creates a new cause of action under Illinois law, meaning companies could be sued directly for damages caused by their AI products. It's currently stalled in committee (re-referred to Assignments).
Last action: May 22, 2026
SB 2273
Illinois SB 2273, the Health Data Privacy Act, would create new rules for how companies collect, use, and share consumer health data outside of HIPAA's reach. It targets wellness apps, fitness trackers, telehealth platforms, and any business processing health-related information about Illinois residents, including AI systems that infer health status from consumer data.
Last action: May 22, 2026
HR 8526
Rep. David Schweikert (R-AZ) introduced a bill requiring mammography facilities that use AI systems to meet new FDA quality standards and undergo additional inspections. The bill would mandate that facilities using AI for breast cancer screening disclose this to patients and maintain specific documentation about their AI tools.
Last action: Apr 27, 2026
HR 8283
Rep. Bill Huizenga (R-MI) introduced legislation to prevent foreign adversaries, particularly China, from stealing or accessing advanced American AI models. The bill would block companies from exporting AI models above certain capability thresholds to China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea, and requires security reviews before sharing powerful AI systems with any foreign entity.
Last action: Apr 22, 2026
HB 5521
Illinois House Bill 5521, the Biometric Surveillance Act, would regulate how organizations use facial recognition and other biometric identification technologies in public and private spaces. Given Illinois already has the nation's strictest biometric privacy law (BIPA), this bill likely adds new restrictions on surveillance-specific uses like real-time face scanning, retail loss prevention cameras, and workplace monitoring.
Last action: Apr 9, 2026
HB 3567
Illinois HB 3567, introduced by Rep. Murri Briel and a large coalition of House Democrats, would require that consequential decisions made with AI receive 'meaningful human review' rather than being fully automated. The bill targets situations where algorithms make or heavily influence decisions about people (think hiring, lending, housing, benefits) and mandates a real human stay in the loop.
Last action: Mar 27, 2026
HR 8094
Rep. Don Beyer (D-VA) introduced legislation requiring companies that develop or deploy large AI models (like GPT-4 or Claude) to publicly disclose detailed information about their AI systems. Companies would need to report training data sources, model capabilities, safety testing results, and energy consumption to a new federal registry within 90 days of deployment.
Last action: Mar 26, 2026
S 4199
Senator Markey (D-MA) introduced a bill that would ban companies from using AI to collect or process personal data from anyone under 17 without explicit consent. The Youth AI Privacy Act specifically targets AI systems that analyze biometric data, predict behavior, or make automated decisions about minors, requiring companies to delete collected data and conduct regular impact assessments.
Last action: Mar 25, 2026
HR 8037
Rep. Baumgartner (R-WA) introduced a bill requiring companies to disclose when they use AI systems trained on data from China, Russia, Iran, or North Korea. Companies would face fines up to $5 million for failing to tell customers about these foreign data sources in their AI products.
Last action: Mar 24, 2026
S 3952
Senator Peters introduced a bill that would create new compliance requirements for companies using AI in high-stakes decisions like hiring, lending, healthcare, and criminal justice. Companies would need to conduct annual bias audits, implement human oversight systems, and publicly disclose when AI makes decisions affecting people's lives.
Last action: Mar 19, 2026
S 3982
Senator Harris introduced S 3982 to make companies criminally liable when their AI systems are used to commit fraud, even if the company didn't intend the fraud. The bill closes a legal loophole where businesses could claim their AI acted independently, forcing companies to take responsibility for fraudulent outcomes from their automated systems.
Last action: Mar 4, 2026
HB 1271
Indiana's HEA 1271, now Public Law 88, cracks down on AI-driven health insurance claims processing. Insurers can no longer use AI alone to downcode a claim without a human reviewing the patient's medical record, and providers can't submit claims through automated tools without human oversight. Insurers must also disclose when AI is used to deny a prior authorization request or downcode a claim.
Last action: Mar 4, 2026
HR 7696
Rep. Jackson Lee introduced HR 7696 to protect critical infrastructure from AI-powered cyberattacks. The bill would require companies operating power grids, water systems, and other essential services to implement specific AI security measures and conduct regular vulnerability assessments. It creates new federal oversight of AI systems used in critical infrastructure with mandatory reporting of AI-related security incidents.
Last action: Feb 26, 2026
SB3601
Illinois Senator Steve Stadelman's SB3601 would require any professional licensed by the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (think real estate agents, accountants, cosmetologists, contractors) to tell paying clients when they're interacting with AI instead of a human, both verbally and in writing. It also amends Illinois consumer fraud law so that any business using AI in commerce must disclose that fact if a consumer asks. Violations carry civil penalties up to $2,500 each, starting January 1, 2027.
Last action: Feb 5, 2026
HB5044
Illinois Rep. Jennifer Gong-Gershowitz introduced a bill that would treat chatbots as 'products' under strict liability law, meaning any company that creates or distributes a chatbot could be sued for user injuries even if they took every reasonable precaution. Users could sue for damages, injunctions, and attorney's fees in state or federal court, with no requirement that they had a direct relationship with the chatbot provider.
Last action: Feb 4, 2026
SB3180
Illinois Senator Rachel Ventura's SB3180 would require any company deploying AI to Illinois residents to get explicit written consent before training AI on user data and keeping that training data indefinitely. Starting January 2027, violators face lawsuits from users ($1,000 to $5,000 per violation plus attorney fees) and enforcement by the Illinois Attorney General under the state's consumer fraud law.
Last action: Feb 2, 2026
SB3027
Illinois Senator Mike Simmons introduced SB3027, which would ban all Illinois hospitals from using artificial intelligence to set or influence any patient pricing or billing decisions. The bill amends the Fair Patient Billing Act and applies broadly to any AI tool touching hospital revenue cycle operations, from price-setting algorithms to AI-assisted billing software.
Last action: Jan 29, 2026
SB2995
Illinois Senator Rachel Ventura's SB2995 would require any business using AI to talk to Illinois consumers (think chatbots, AI voice agents, AI sales tools) to clearly disclose that it's AI, not a human. Businesses would also have to offer a free option to talk to a real human during business hours. Violations would be treated as consumer fraud under Illinois law.
Last action: Jan 29, 2026
SB2875
Illinois SB2875, introduced by Sen. Laura Murphy, creates a comprehensive Consumer Data Privacy Act similar to laws in California and Virginia. It gives Illinois residents rights to access, correct, delete, and port their personal data, opt out of targeted advertising and data sales, and challenge AI-driven profiling decisions that affect things like loans, jobs, housing, and healthcare.
Last action: Jan 16, 2026
HB 1421
Indiana House Bill 1421 would completely ban employers from using automated decision systems (like AI hiring software, resume screening tools, or performance evaluation algorithms) to make employment decisions. The bill has just been introduced and sent to the Employment, Labor and Pensions Committee for review.
Last action: Jan 8, 2026
HB1201
Indiana HB1201, introduced by Rep. Elizabeth Rowray and coauthors, would ban AI systems from impersonating or acting as a substitute for a licensed mental health professional. It also tackles insurance reforms like network adequacy audits, reimbursement parity for mental health providers, and limits on retroactive claim audits.
Last action: Jan 5, 2026
HR 6356
Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-NY) introduced legislation requiring companies to audit their AI systems for bias and discrimination before using them to make decisions about people. The bill would give individuals the right to know when AI makes decisions about them and to appeal those decisions to a human.
Last action: Dec 2, 2025
S 3308
Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) introduced a sweeping federal bill that would regulate how companies use AI in consequential decisions like hiring, lending, housing, healthcare, and education. It requires pre-deployment bias testing, independent audits, human review of AI decisions, and bans certain uses like emotion recognition in workplaces and schools.
Last action: Dec 2, 2025
HR 6361
Rep. Greg Landsman (D-OH) introduced this bill to prohibit Medicare Advantage plans and Medicare providers from using AI or algorithms as the sole basis to deny, reduce, or terminate coverage for beneficiaries. A human clinician would need to make the final call on coverage denials, not an automated system.
Last action: Dec 2, 2025
S 3108
Senator Robert Casey Jr. introduced the AI-Related Job Impacts Clarity Act (S 3108), which would require companies to tell the government before using AI in ways that could affect jobs. Companies planning to deploy AI systems that might automate work or change employment would need to file advance notices with the Department of Labor, explaining how many workers could be affected and what support they'll provide.
Last action: Nov 5, 2025
S 2938
Senator Cantwell introduced the Artificial Intelligence Risk Evaluation Act, which would require companies developing AI systems to conduct safety evaluations before release and report critical failures to the government. The bill creates a new federal office to oversee AI safety and gives regulators power to investigate AI incidents, similar to how the NTSB investigates plane crashes.
Last action: Sep 29, 2025
HR 5511
Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-NY) introduced legislation requiring companies to conduct impact assessments before deploying AI systems that could affect consumers. The bill would give the FTC power to enforce these assessments and create a public registry of high-impact AI systems, marking the first major federal attempt to regulate commercial AI use across industries.
Last action: Sep 19, 2025
S 2367
Senator Durbin introduced S 2367, which would require companies using AI for important decisions (like hiring, lending, or healthcare) to explain how their AI works and prove it doesn't discriminate. Companies would need to conduct regular audits of their AI systems, tell people when AI makes decisions about them, and let people opt out of certain AI decisions.
Last action: Jul 21, 2025
S 2164
Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) introduced the Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2025, which would require companies using AI and automated decision-making systems to conduct impact assessments and document how their algorithms work. The bill targets businesses using AI for critical decisions like hiring, lending, healthcare, and housing, forcing them to evaluate their systems for bias, discrimination, and privacy risks before deployment.
Last action: Jun 25, 2025
SB 1425
Illinois Senator Laura Fine's SB 1425 would regulate how health insurers use AI and automated decision systems for coverage decisions like prior authorizations, claims denials, and medical necessity determinations. Insurers would need to ensure a qualified human (not just an algorithm) makes final adverse decisions, and the Department of Insurance would gain audit authority over these AI tools.
Last action: Apr 11, 2025
SB 52
Illinois SB 52, the Privacy Rights Act, would create a comprehensive consumer data privacy framework similar to California's CCPA, giving Illinois residents rights to access, delete, and opt out of the sale of their personal data. It also includes specific provisions on automated decision-making and profiling, meaning AI systems that make consequential decisions about consumers would face new transparency and opt-out requirements. The bill is currently stalled in Senate committee after an amendment.
Last action: Apr 11, 2025
HB3021
Illinois HB3021, introduced by Rep. Abdelnasser Rashid, would make it illegal under the state's Consumer Fraud Act to use chatbots, AI agents, or voice AI in customer interactions without clearly telling consumers they are talking to a machine, not a human. If passed, it takes effect January 1, 2026.
Last action: Feb 6, 2025
HB 5918
Illinois Rep. Bob Morgan's HB 5918 would regulate how health insurers use AI and algorithms to make coverage decisions, likely requiring human oversight on claim denials and prior authorizations. The bill is currently in the Rules Committee and targets one of the most controversial uses of AI in healthcare: automated denial of patient claims.
Last action: Jan 4, 2025
HB 4093
Illinois Rep. Ann Williams and 18 co-sponsors introduced the Health Data Privacy Act to regulate how companies collect, use, and share consumer health data outside of HIPAA's reach (think period-tracking apps, wellness wearables, and mental health platforms). The bill would require explicit consumer consent before processing health data and give Illinois residents new rights to access and delete their information.
Last action: Apr 19, 2024
HB 4869
Illinois Representatives Hoan Huynh, Norma Hernandez, and Kevin Olickal introduced HB 4869 to amend the state's Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, requiring businesses to disclose when they use AI in consumer-facing interactions. The bill targets undisclosed AI use in customer service, marketing, and sales communications. It's currently stalled in the Rules Committee.
Last action: Apr 5, 2024
SB 150
Indiana's SB 150, now signed into law, requires companies using AI in high-stakes decisions (like hiring, lending, or healthcare) to conduct regular bias audits and provide clear explanations when AI affects people's lives. The law creates new compliance requirements for businesses using AI tools, with penalties for companies that don't properly test their systems or notify customers about AI use.
Last action: Mar 13, 2024
SB 3080
Illinois SB 3080 would create a new health data privacy law regulating how companies collect, use, and share consumer health information outside of HIPAA's reach, including data from wellness apps, fitness trackers, and online health searches. It would require explicit consumer consent, restrict geofencing around healthcare facilities, and give consumers rights to access and delete their health data.
Last action: Feb 2, 2024
HB 3603
Illinois Rep. Ann Williams and 24 co-sponsors introduced the PROTECT Health Data Act (HB 3603) to tighten how companies collect, share, and sell consumer health data in Illinois. While the bill description is sparse, similar 'protect health data' frameworks in other states restrict tracking of reproductive health, mental health, and biometric data, and often limit AI/algorithmic processing of that data without consent.
Last action: Aug 17, 2023
SB 468
Indiana has updated its commercial code to address AI and other automated systems in business transactions. The bill, signed into law, creates new rules for when AI systems can form contracts and make business decisions, and clarifies liability when AI systems malfunction or make errors.
Last action: May 4, 2023
SB 5
Indiana's SB 5 creates comprehensive consumer data privacy rules similar to California's CCPA and Europe's GDPR. The law gives Indiana residents rights to access, delete, and opt out of the sale of their personal data, while requiring businesses that collect data from Indiana residents to implement specific privacy practices and safeguards.
Last action: May 1, 2023
SB 358
Senator Freeman's SB 358 requires businesses to get explicit consent before using AI to analyze consumer data in Indiana. Companies would need to tell customers exactly how AI processes their information, let them opt out, and delete data on request. This brings GDPR-style data rights specifically to AI systems.
Last action: Feb 17, 2022
SB 576
Indiana's SB 576 would ban employers from using AI systems that scan faces or voices during hiring unless they tell candidates first and get written consent. The bill, currently in committee, creates new rules for any company using AI-powered video interviews or voice analysis tools to screen job applicants.
Last action: Jan 14, 2019
HB 1540
Indiana HB 1540 creates new rules for healthcare professionals using AI to make medical decisions. The bill requires doctors, nurses, and other licensed healthcare providers to disclose when they use AI tools for diagnosis or treatment recommendations, and makes them legally responsible for any AI-generated medical advice they provide to patients.
Last action: Apr 26, 2017
HR 9757
Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA) introduced HR 9757, the Conversational AI Services Act, which would establish federal rules for chatbots and conversational AI systems (think ChatGPT-style assistants, customer service bots, and voice agents). The bill sits in the House Energy and Commerce Committee and would likely require clear disclosure when consumers are interacting with AI rather than a human.
Last action: Jul 16, 2026
HR 9619
Rep. Valerie Foushee (D-NC) introduced this bill to require AI chatbot providers (think ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and customer service bots) to protect user data and follow specific privacy and security rules. It targets how chatbots collect, store, and use consumer information during conversations.
Last action: Jul 9, 2026
SB 343
Illinois SB 343, sponsored by Senator Napoleon Harris and colleagues, has passed both chambers and is heading to the Governor's desk. The bill amends Illinois civil law provisions related to technology, though the specific AI regulatory scope is not detailed in the available text. Business leaders in Illinois should track this closely given its advanced status.
Last action: Jun 30, 2026
HR 9477
Rep. Nathaniel Moran (R-TX) introduced this bill to create a federal system for reporting serious AI incidents, meaning cases where AI systems cause harm, malfunction, or produce dangerous outputs. It would require AI developers and deployers to notify the government when their systems cause specified harms, similar to how airlines report safety incidents.
Last action: Jun 25, 2026
HR 9279
Rep. Harriet Hageman (R-WY) introduced this bill to prohibit AI developers from censoring or suppressing lawful speech in their AI models. It would create new federal restrictions on how companies like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic moderate content generated by their AI systems, with enforcement likely through the FTC or private right of action.
Last action: Jun 11, 2026
HR 9125
Rep. Sara Jacobs (D-CA) introduced the Sectoral AI Governance Act of 2026, which would assign AI oversight to existing federal agencies based on the sector where AI is used (think FDA for medical AI, EEOC for hiring AI) rather than creating one new mega-regulator. The bill is sitting in the House Judiciary and Oversight Committees, so nothing is law yet, but it signals where federal AI rules are heading.
Last action: Jun 3, 2026
SB 3890
Illinois SB 3890 would overhaul the state's consumer data privacy framework, creating new rules for how companies collect, use, and share personal data, including data fed into AI systems. The bill is currently stalled in committee (re-referred to Assignments under Rule 3-9(a)), meaning it has not advanced to a floor vote.
Last action: May 22, 2026
SB 2993
Illinois SB 2993, introduced by Sen. Rachel Ventura, would prohibit AI systems from prescribing medication to patients in Illinois. Only licensed human healthcare providers could make prescribing decisions, though AI could still assist them. The bill is currently stuck in committee after being re-referred to Assignments.
Last action: May 22, 2026
SB 3261
Illinois Senator Mary Edly-Allen and 11 co-sponsors introduced SB 3261, the Artificial Intelligence Safety Act, which aims to create safety guardrails around AI systems developed or deployed in Illinois. The bill is currently stalled in committee (re-referred to Assignments), so the specific provisions have not yet advanced to active debate.
Last action: May 22, 2026
SB 3702
Illinois Senator Graciela Guzmán's bill would prohibit hospitals and healthcare employers from using AI to replace registered nurses' clinical judgment or to make final patient care decisions without RN oversight. It targets AI tools that recommend diagnoses, staffing levels, or treatment plans in nursing workflows. The bill sits in committee and has been re-referred to Assignments, meaning it has not yet advanced.
Last action: May 22, 2026
SB 3312
Illinois SB 3312, the AI Safety Measures Act, would establish state-level safety requirements for AI systems developed or deployed in Illinois. The bill is currently stalled in committee after being re-referred to Assignments, meaning it has not advanced and faces procedural hurdles before any vote.
Last action: May 22, 2026
SB 3220
Illinois SB 3220 would expand the state's consumer data privacy framework, adding new rules around how businesses collect, use, and share personal data, including data processed by AI systems. It's currently stuck in committee after being re-referred to Assignments, so it hasn't advanced to active debate.
Last action: May 22, 2026
SB 3364
Illinois SB 3364 would prohibit the use of AI systems that violate civil or human rights, creating a new cause of action against companies deploying discriminatory AI. The bill is currently stalled in committee with a Senate Committee Amendment under Rule 3-9(a), meaning it's been re-referred to Assignments.
Last action: May 22, 2026
SB 3444
Illinois SB 3444, introduced by Senator Bill Cunningham, aims to regulate the safety of AI models developed or deployed in Illinois. The bill is currently stalled in committee (re-referred to Assignments), so specific requirements aren't finalized, but it signals Illinois intends to join California and Colorado in setting AI model safety standards.
Last action: May 22, 2026
HR 8819
Rep. Ted Lieu's bill would require federal agencies to follow the NIST AI Risk Management Framework when buying or building AI systems. While it directly targets government use, it effectively forces any company selling AI to the federal government to align their products with NIST standards.
Last action: May 14, 2026
HB 4705
Illinois House Bill 4705, introduced by Rep. Dan Didech and a group of Democratic co-sponsors, is an 'Artificial Intelligence Safety' bill currently in its earliest stage with limited public detail available. Based on the title and Illinois's recent AI legislative trends, it appears aimed at establishing safety standards for AI systems deployed in the state, though specific provisions have not yet been published.
Last action: May 8, 2026
HB 4735
Illinois HB 4735, the Transparency in Downcoding Act, targets the practice of 'downcoding' in healthcare billing, where insurers or their AI tools reduce the billing code submitted by a provider to a lower-paying one. The bill would force health insurers to disclose when and how they downcode claims, including any algorithms or AI systems used to make those decisions.
Last action: May 5, 2026
HB 4980
Illinois Rep. Abdelnasser Rashid and 20 co-sponsors introduced the Human Control of AI Act, which would require meaningful human oversight of AI systems used in consequential decisions. The bill is currently parked in the Rules Committee, meaning it has not advanced but signals where Illinois Democrats want to take AI regulation.
Last action: Apr 17, 2026
HB 3041
Illinois Rep. Abdelnasser Rashid introduced HB 3041, a comprehensive data privacy bill that would regulate how companies collect, use, and share consumer data, including data used to train and operate AI systems. The bill has stalled in the Rules Committee, but if revived, it would create new consumer rights (access, deletion, opt-out) and impose obligations on businesses handling Illinois residents' data.
Last action: Mar 27, 2026
HB 4804
Illinois HB 4804 sets rules for how registered nurses can use AI tools in patient care. The bill ensures AI assists but does not replace nursing judgment, requiring human oversight when AI is used for clinical decisions. It is currently stalled in the Rules Committee.
Last action: Mar 27, 2026
HR 8031
Representative Boebert introduced HR 8031 to repeal Biden's Executive Order on AI that established federal AI safety standards and oversight requirements. The bill would eliminate current federal AI governance frameworks, removing requirements for federal agencies to assess AI risks and for companies to report on their AI development activities.
Last action: Mar 20, 2026
S 4113
Senator Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) introduced the AI Guardrails Act to force federal agencies to set safety rules for AI systems before they can deploy them. The bill requires agencies to identify risks, establish testing procedures, and create ways to shut down AI systems that go wrong, with the Department of Defense and intelligence agencies mostly exempt.
Last action: Mar 17, 2026
S 4098
Senator Ted Budd (R-NC) introduced the Artificial Intelligence-Ready Data Act to create federal guidelines for how businesses prepare and manage data used in AI systems. The bill would establish new requirements for data quality, documentation, and transparency when companies use data to train or operate AI tools, affecting any business that develops or deploys AI systems.
Last action: Mar 16, 2026
S 4069
Senator Todd Young (R-IN) introduced a bill requiring NIST to create standardized formats for biological data used in AI systems. The bill focuses on making bio-data (like genomic sequences, protein structures, and clinical trial results) consistent and interoperable across different AI platforms, which would help pharmaceutical companies, biotech firms, and research institutions share data more easily for drug discovery and medical AI development.
Last action: Mar 12, 2026
HB 4799
Illinois HB 4799, the AI Safety Measures Act, is sitting in the Rules Committee with limited public detail available so far. Based on its title, it aims to establish baseline safety requirements for AI systems used or deployed in Illinois, though the specific obligations have not yet been made public.
Last action: Feb 6, 2026
HB5003
Illinois Rep. Bob Morgan's HB5003 carves out a narrow exemption in the state's therapy licensing law so academic medical centers can research AI-assisted therapy without violating rules against unlicensed psychotherapy. The exemption only covers IRB-approved studies at accredited hospitals, not commercial AI therapy products sold to consumers, and it expires January 1, 2030.
Last action: Feb 4, 2026
S 3680
Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) introduced this bill to require federal agencies that use AI systems to test them for bias, appoint civil rights officers to oversee AI use, and be transparent about how algorithms make decisions affecting the public. It targets government use of AI, not private companies directly, but sets standards that could ripple into federal contracting requirements.
Last action: Jan 15, 2026
HR 7110
Rep. Summer Lee's bill would require federal agencies to root out bias in any AI systems they use or fund, mandating civil rights reviews, bias testing, and public transparency. It targets algorithms used in federal decisions like benefits, housing, law enforcement, and hiring, and would create new oversight requirements before agencies can deploy AI.
Last action: Jan 15, 2026
HR 5388
Rep. Michael Baumgartner (R-WA) introduced this bill to establish federal uniformity over AI regulation, likely preempting the patchwork of state AI laws emerging in places like California, Colorado, and New York. If passed, it would centralize AI rules at the federal level and position the US to lead globally on AI standards.
Last action: Dec 19, 2025
S 3312
Senator Gary Peters (D-MI) introduced this bill to prepare the U.S. for the shift to quantum computing, which threatens to break today's encryption standards. It would fund quantum research, workforce development, and push federal agencies to adopt quantum-resistant cybersecurity measures.
Last action: Dec 2, 2025
HR 6266
Rep. Mike Kennedy (R-UT-3) introduced the Algorithm Accountability Act, which sits in the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Based on its title and referral, the bill aims to impose transparency and accountability requirements on companies deploying algorithmic and AI systems, likely targeting automated decision-making that affects consumers.
Last action: Nov 21, 2025
S 3193
Sen. John Curtis (R-UT) introduced the Algorithm Accountability Act, which targets how companies use algorithms and AI systems to make consequential decisions about consumers. The bill sits in the Senate Commerce Committee and would likely require businesses to assess and document the impact of their automated decision-making tools in areas like credit, housing, employment, and healthcare.
Last action: Nov 18, 2025
S 2937
Senator Thom Tillis introduced the AI LEAD Act to regulate how federal agencies use AI systems. The bill requires agencies to tell Congress before buying or using AI, sets up testing requirements to catch problems before deployment, and creates new oversight rules with real penalties if agencies mess up their AI implementations.
Last action: Sep 29, 2025
HR 5045
Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA) introduced the HEALTH AI Act, which would establish federal oversight of artificial intelligence used in healthcare settings like clinical decision-making, diagnostics, and patient care. The bill is currently in the House Energy and Commerce Committee and aims to set safety, transparency, and validation standards for medical AI tools.
Last action: Aug 26, 2025
HR 4873
Rep. Jimmy Patronis (R-FL) introduced HR 4873 to turn Biden's Executive Order 14319 into permanent law, which requires federal agencies to avoid using AI systems that show bias based on race, gender, or other protected characteristics. The bill would make it illegal for any federal agency to use AI tools that discriminate in hiring, benefits distribution, or service delivery.
Last action: Aug 5, 2025
S 2081
Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) introduced the RISE Act of 2025, which addresses liability for AI developers when their models are used by professionals like doctors, lawyers, and financial advisors. The bill would grant AI developers civil liability protection if they publicly disclose model specifications, training data characteristics, and known limitations, shifting responsibility to the licensed professionals who deploy these tools.
Last action: Jun 12, 2025
HR 3460
Rep. Jay Obernolte (R-CA) introduced this federal bill to protect employees at AI companies who report safety concerns or violations to the government. It would shield workers from retaliation (firing, demotion, harassment) when they blow the whistle on AI-related risks, similar to existing protections in finance and healthcare.
Last action: May 15, 2025
S 1638
Senator Bill Cassidy (R-LA) introduced a bill that would restrict U.S. businesses and government agencies from using AI systems developed by companies based in foreign adversary nations like China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. Think of it as an export-controls-style crackdown, but for AI models like DeepSeek. It sits in the Senate Commerce Committee awaiting review.
Last action: May 7, 2025
SB 2203
Illinois SB 2203 would regulate 'automated decision tools' used to make consequential decisions about people, things like hiring, lending, housing, healthcare, and education. Companies deploying these AI systems would need to conduct impact assessments, notify affected individuals, and avoid algorithmic discrimination. The bill is currently stuck in committee (re-referred to Assignments under Rule 3-9(a)), meaning it has stalled but is not dead.
Last action: Apr 11, 2025
HB 3720
Illinois Rep. Abdelnasser Rashid introduced HB 3720 to require 'meaningful human review' when AI systems make consequential decisions about people. The bill targets automated decision-making in areas like employment, housing, credit, and government benefits, ensuring a real person (not just a rubber stamp) reviews AI outputs before they affect someone's life. It's currently stalled in the Rules Committee.
Last action: Mar 21, 2025
SB2259
Illinois Senator Laura Fine's SB2259 would require hospitals, clinics, and doctors' offices in Illinois to disclose when they use generative AI (like ChatGPT) to create patient communications about clinical matters. If a human clinician reviews the AI-generated message before it goes out, no disclosure is needed.
Last action: Feb 7, 2025
HR 1027
Rep. Eric Sorensen (D-IL-17) introduced the QUIET Act, which stands for Quashing Unwanted and Interruptive Electronic Telecommunications. The bill targets AI-generated robocalls and deepfake voice scams by requiring clear disclosure when AI is used in phone calls and text messages, and it strengthens penalties for scammers using voice-cloning technology to impersonate real people.
Last action: Feb 6, 2025
HB 1620
Indiana Representative King introduced HB 1620, requiring healthcare providers to tell patients when they use AI in medical decisions. If a doctor, hospital, or insurance company uses AI to diagnose you, recommend treatment, or decide coverage, they must disclose this to patients in writing.
Last action: Jan 21, 2025
HR 334
Rep. Rick Allen (R-GA) introduced this bill to amend the Communications Act of 1934, requiring the FCC to set technical and procedural standards for AI-generated voice systems used in phone calls. It targets the growing problem of AI voice clones and synthetic robocalls by mandating disclosure and authentication rules for generative AI voices.
Last action: Jan 13, 2025
HR 238
Rep. David Schweikert (R-AZ-1) introduced the Healthy Technology Act of 2025, a very short bill that would let artificial intelligence and machine learning technology qualify as a 'practitioner' eligible to prescribe drugs, as long as it's authorized by state law and approved by the FDA. In practice, this would open the door for AI systems to legally prescribe medications in the United States for the first time.
Last action: Jan 7, 2025
HB 3338
Illinois HB 3338 (SAFE PATIENT LIMITS) sets mandatory nurse-to-patient staffing ratios in hospitals and restricts how hospitals can use AI or algorithmic tools to determine staffing levels or override nurse clinical judgment. It targets workforce management software that healthcare systems increasingly rely on to schedule nurses and predict patient acuity.
Last action: Apr 24, 2024
HB 3385
Illinois Rep. Abdelnasser Rashid introduced HB 3385, a broad data privacy and protection bill currently stalled in the Rules Committee. While the full text details aren't available, the bill appears to establish consumer data privacy rights similar to laws in California and other states, which would directly affect how businesses collect, store, and use personal data including data fed into AI systems.
Last action: Apr 5, 2024
HB 5649
Illinois Rep. Abdelnasser Rashid's HB 5649 directs the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation to regulate the use of AI in delivering mental health services. The bill aims to set guardrails on how therapy chatbots, AI counseling tools, and similar products can be used with patients in Illinois. It's currently stuck in the Rules Committee.
Last action: Apr 5, 2024
SB 2795
Illinois SB 2795, introduced by Senator Mike Halpin, sets mandatory nurse-to-patient staffing ratios in hospitals. While titled the Safe Patient Limits Act, it touches AI only tangentially by restricting hospitals from using AI or algorithmic staffing tools to override the mandated minimum ratios. The bill is currently stalled in committee assignments.
Last action: Mar 15, 2024
SB 2314
Illinois Senate Bill 2314, the Safe Patient Limits Act, sets mandatory nurse-to-patient ratios in hospitals across the state. While not primarily an AI bill, it restricts hospitals from using AI or algorithmic staffing tools to override these minimum staffing requirements. Sen. Celina Villanueva leads a group of eight Democratic co-sponsors.
Last action: Mar 7, 2024
HB 1554
HB 1554, introduced in Indiana, aims to protect consumer data privacy. The bill would likely create new requirements for businesses that collect and use personal data, similar to laws in other states like California and Virginia. Without the full bill text, specific requirements and scope remain unclear.
Last action: Jan 19, 2023
S 5061
Senator Mark Warner (D-VA) introduced this bill to create a federal system for tracking AI security incidents and vulnerabilities, similar to how we track cybersecurity threats today. It would task federal agencies (likely NIST and CISA) with building processes to collect, analyze, and share information about AI safety failures and security risks. The bill sits in the Commerce Committee and does not yet impose direct requirements on private companies.
Last action: Jul 21, 2026
HR 9686
Rep. Zach Nunn (R-IA) introduced the FARM AI Act to push the USDA to develop and support AI tools specifically for American agriculture, covering things like crop monitoring, livestock management, and supply chain optimization. It's a pro-innovation bill focused on funding, research, and coordination rather than restricting AI use. Currently sitting in the House Agriculture Committee.
Last action: Jul 14, 2026
HR 9333
Rep. Deborah Ross (D-NC) introduced this bill to create a coordinated system for reporting security flaws and vulnerabilities in AI systems, similar to how cybersecurity bugs get reported today. It would direct NIST to establish standardized processes for researchers and companies to disclose AI vulnerabilities responsibly.
Last action: Jun 25, 2026
HR 9341
Rep. Brian Babin (R-TX) introduced this bill to direct federal agencies to make their public datasets more usable for training AI models, things like standardized formats, machine-readable structures, and clear metadata. It targets government data practices, not private sector AI use, aiming to give US companies and researchers better raw material for building AI systems.
Last action: Jun 25, 2026
HR 2385
The CREATE AI Act, introduced in the House of Representatives, would establish the National AI Research Resource (NAIRR) to give academic researchers and small businesses access to computing power and datasets for AI development. This federal program would level the playing field between Big Tech companies and smaller organizations by providing free access to expensive AI infrastructure that currently only major corporations can afford.
Last action: Jun 25, 2026
HR 9439
Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) introduced this bill to create a voluntary federal pilot program where consumer-facing AI companies can opt in to standardized disclosure labels, similar to nutrition labels for food. Participation is optional and the program is designed to test what AI transparency information consumers actually find useful before any mandatory rules get written.
Last action: Jun 24, 2026
S 4916
Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) introduced this bill to create a federal task force studying how AI can help older Americans age safely at home and improve elder care. It's a research and recommendations effort, not a regulatory action, focused on things like AI-powered fall detection, medication management, and caregiver support tools.
Last action: Jun 24, 2026
HR 9326
Rep. Daniel Webster (R-FL) introduced this bill to boost U.S. influence in setting global technical standards for AI and other emerging technologies. It directs NIST and the State Department to encourage American participation in international standards-setting bodies, but creates no new rules for private companies.
Last action: Jun 15, 2026
HR 9323
Rep. Luz Rivas (D-CA) introduced this bill to create a new federal agency, the Department of Advanced Technology and Artificial Intelligence, to coordinate U.S. AI policy and oversight. The bill is currently sitting in the House Oversight Committee and would centralize federal AI governance rather than imposing direct rules on private companies.
Last action: Jun 15, 2026
HR 9285
Representative Michael Lawler's bill directs federal agencies to use AI to better track, predict, and respond to extreme heat emergencies. It focuses on improving government forecasting and public health response, not on regulating private-sector AI. The bill sits in the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
Last action: Jun 11, 2026
HR 635
Illinois House Resolution 635, introduced by Rep. Carol Ammons with co-sponsors Lilian Jiménez and Maurice West, expresses state support for a 4-day work week. As a resolution, it's a symbolic statement of legislative intent rather than a binding law, and it has no direct connection to AI regulation.
Last action: May 28, 2026
SB 2413
Illinois SB 2413 creates a state-run Family and Medical Leave Program, not an AI-specific bill. It establishes paid family and medical leave benefits for Illinois workers and has no direct AI regulation component. It currently sits in committee with no active sponsor movement.
Last action: May 22, 2026
S 4441
Senator Todd Young (R-IN) reintroduced the CREATE AI Act to formally establish the National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource (NAIRR), a shared federal computing and data infrastructure that gives academics, startups, and small developers access to the expensive tools needed to build AI. It's about democratizing AI research, not regulating private sector AI use.
Last action: Apr 29, 2026
S 4414
Senator Adam Schiff's LIFT AI Act would direct the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to study AI literacy and workforce readiness across the U.S. economy. It does not create new rules for businesses; it sets up federal research and recommendations on closing the AI skills gap.
Last action: Apr 28, 2026
HR 8516
Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA) introduced this bill to position the U.S. as the global leader in AI development through federal investment in research, workforce training, and public-private partnerships. It's primarily a strategic and funding bill, not a regulatory crackdown, focused on boosting American AI competitiveness rather than restricting how companies use AI.
Last action: Apr 27, 2026
HR 6996
The Full AI Stack Export Promotion Act (HR 6996) aims to boost US exports of AI technologies by streamlining export controls and creating new government programs to help American AI companies sell internationally. While the full text isn't available yet, the title suggests it covers the entire AI technology chain from chips to software, likely reducing barriers that currently make it hard for US companies to export AI products.
Last action: Apr 22, 2026
HB 4596
Illinois HB 4596 directs the state Department of Public Health to combat health-related misinformation, likely including AI-generated content spreading false medical claims. The bill is in early stages with co-sponsors being added, including Rep. Camille Y. Lilly. Without a detailed description available, the bill appears focused on public health communications rather than direct private-sector AI regulation.
Last action: Apr 14, 2026
HB 3483
Illinois HB 3483 establishes a state Family & Medical Leave Program, not an AI-focused bill. It creates paid leave benefits for Illinois workers and has no direct AI regulatory provisions based on available information.
Last action: Apr 7, 2026
S 4216
Senator Brian Schatz (D-HI) introduced a bill to repeal President Biden's Executive Order on AI, which currently requires federal agencies to develop AI safety standards and companies to share AI safety test results with the government. This would eliminate federal AI oversight requirements that the Executive Order put in place.
Last action: Mar 26, 2026
HR 7058
Representative Jim Himes introduced HR 7058, which requires the State Department to create an office that evaluates AI risks from China, Russia, and other adversary nations. The bill doesn't regulate businesses directly but mandates government reports on foreign AI threats that could influence future regulations and federal AI procurement decisions.
Last action: Mar 26, 2026
S 4179
Senator Murkowski (R-AK) introduced a bill requiring states to involve tribal representatives when investigating child abuse cases involving Native American children. The bill mandates that state child protective services notify and coordinate with tribes within 24 hours when AI-powered risk assessment tools flag potential abuse cases involving Native children.
Last action: Mar 24, 2026
HR 8048
Rep. Adelita Grijalva (D-AZ) introduced the AI/AN CAPTA bill, which despite the name appears to focus on American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) provisions under the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, not artificial intelligence. The bill was referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce and likely addresses child welfare services for tribal communities rather than AI technology regulation.
Last action: Mar 24, 2026
HR 7968
Rep. Suhas Subramanyam (D-VA) introduced this bill to help small businesses and startups access federal AI resources. It would create a new program at NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) that gives smaller companies access to government AI testing tools, datasets, and expertise that are currently only available to large corporations and research institutions.
Last action: Mar 17, 2026
HR 7907
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) introduced a bill directing NIST to create standardized formats for biological data that AI systems can read and process. The bill focuses on making DNA sequences, protein structures, and other biological data work better across different AI platforms and research tools. It aims to accelerate biotech innovation by making it easier for AI companies to train models on biological datasets.
Last action: Mar 12, 2026
SB 2022
Illinois Senate Bill 2022, the Safe Patient Limits Act, sets mandatory nurse-to-patient staffing ratios in hospitals across the state. Introduced by Sen. Celina Villanueva with co-sponsors including Sen. Mattie Hunter, it focuses on hospital staffing rules rather than AI regulation, though it could indirectly affect how hospitals use AI-driven staffing and scheduling tools.
Last action: Mar 12, 2026
SB4020
Illinois SB4020, introduced by Sen. Bill Cunningham, creates a framework to expand district energy systems (centralized heating/cooling networks) and thermal energy storage across the state. It requires large developers (buildings over 100,000 sq ft) to conduct District Energy Feasibility Assessments, sets up grants and financing programs, and puts thermal storage on equal footing with electric storage in state incentive programs. This bill has essentially nothing to do with AI regulation.
Last action: Feb 6, 2026
HR 7294
Rep. Robert Menendez (D-NJ) introduced the AI for Secure Networks Act to improve cybersecurity in critical infrastructure by using AI to detect and respond to threats. The bill would direct the Department of Homeland Security to develop AI tools for protecting power grids, water systems, and other essential services from cyber attacks.
Last action: Jan 30, 2026
HR 7226
Rep. Blake Moore (R-UT) introduced this bill directing federal agencies to use AI to review the Code of Federal Regulations and identify outdated, duplicative, or unnecessary rules for repeal. It's aimed at government deregulation, not at regulating private-sector AI use.
Last action: Jan 22, 2026
HR 7064
Rep. Pablo Jose Hernández (D-PR) introduced this bill to study how AI is being used in healthcare and identify ways it can improve efficiency across the U.S. health system. It doesn't impose new rules on companies; it directs a federal study and report on AI applications in medical settings.
Last action: Jan 14, 2026
S 3586
Senator Todd Young (R-IN) introduced a bill to create a voluntary AI certification program specifically for small businesses. The bill would establish an 'AI Center of Excellence' at the Small Business Administration that helps small companies adopt AI responsibly through training, resources, and a certification process that could give them advantages in federal contracting.
Last action: Jan 7, 2026
S 3557
Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) introduced this bill to explicitly protect states' rights to pass and enforce their own AI laws, blocking any federal preemption efforts. It's a direct response to Congressional proposals that would prevent states like California, Colorado, and New York from regulating AI independently. If passed, businesses would continue facing a patchwork of state AI rules rather than a single federal standard.
Last action: Dec 17, 2025
S 3336
Senator Maggie Hassan (D-NH) introduced this bill to fund federal research into making AI systems more reliable, predictable, and trustworthy. It directs government agencies to study and develop standards for AI reliability but does not impose new rules on private companies. The bill is currently sitting in the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.
Last action: Dec 3, 2025
HR 6304
Rep. Jennifer Kiggans (R-VA) introduced a bill to create a new AI research hub within the National Science Foundation that would fund academic research into AI safety and ethics. The bill would allocate $100 million annually for five years to universities studying how to make AI systems more transparent, secure, and aligned with American values.
Last action: Nov 25, 2025
HR 6077
Rep. Nanette Barragán's HEAL-AI Act (HR 6077) directs federal health agencies to study how AI is used in healthcare, focusing on patient safety, bias, privacy, and clinical decision-making. It's an information-gathering bill at this stage, not a regulatory mandate, and sits in the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
Last action: Nov 18, 2025
S 3063
Senator Bill Cassidy (R-LA) introduced the LIFE with AI Act to study how artificial intelligence is reshaping American life, including its impact on jobs, education, and healthcare. The bill appears focused on research and policy recommendations rather than immediate AI regulation, and it has been referred to the Senate HELP Committee.
Last action: Oct 28, 2025
HRES 694
Rep. Greg Landsman (D-OH) introduced a non-binding House resolution urging CMS to halt its WISeR pilot program, which uses AI to help make Medicare prior authorization decisions. It expresses the sense of the House but does not carry the force of law.
Last action: Sep 10, 2025
HR 5227
Rep. Jim Costa (D-CA-21) introduced this bill to expand AI infrastructure and access in rural areas, likely through federal support for low-cost AI computing resources in underserved regions. It's currently sitting in the House Science Committee with no compliance requirements attached, this is about funding and access, not regulation.
Last action: Sep 9, 2025
S 2615
Senator John Hickenlooper (D-CO) introduced the VET Artificial Intelligence Act to create a federal framework for third-party auditing and verification of AI systems. It would direct NIST to develop voluntary specifications and guidelines that independent evaluators use to assess whether AI systems comply with existing laws and industry standards.
Last action: Jul 31, 2025
S 2381
Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) introduced the PROACTIV AI Data Act, which aims to expand access to high-quality training data for American AI developers. The bill focuses on making federal data more available to AI companies to strengthen US competitiveness in AI development. It's currently sitting in the Senate Commerce Committee.
Last action: Jul 22, 2025
HR 1709
Rep. Greg Landsman's bill directs the federal government to study cybersecurity vulnerabilities in US mobile networks, including threats from foreign adversaries and weaknesses in older protocols like SS7 and Diameter. It requires a report to Congress within one year but creates no new business regulations or compliance obligations.
Last action: Jul 15, 2025
S 1110
Senator Jon Husted (R-OH) introduced this bill to have federal agencies use AI to comb through the Code of Federal Regulations and flag outdated, duplicative, or overly burdensome rules for elimination. It's a government-facing efficiency effort, not a regulation on private AI use.
Last action: Mar 25, 2025
HB 3529
Illinois Rep. Janet Yang Rohr introduced HB 3529 to establish state-level AI principles, likely setting baseline expectations for how AI systems should be developed and used in Illinois. The bill is currently stalled in the Rules Committee, meaning it has not advanced to substantive debate or amendment.
Last action: Mar 21, 2025
HR 1694
Rep. Josh Harder (D-CA-9) introduced the AI Accountability Act, which directs federal agencies to study how AI is being used and its risks. The bill sits in the House Energy and Commerce Committee and, based on available information, appears to focus on federal reporting rather than imposing direct rules on private companies.
Last action: Feb 27, 2025
S 501
Senator Ted Budd (R-NC) introduced this bill to require HHS to develop a strategy for preparing and responding to public health threats created or worsened by AI, such as AI-generated bioweapons, misinformation, or biosecurity risks. It directs federal health agencies to plan, not regulate private companies directly.
Last action: Feb 10, 2025
SB 1252
Illinois SB 1252 appears to be a standard identification documentation bill currently sitting in committee. Without published bill text or sponsor details available, the specific AI implications are unclear, but ID documentation laws can intersect with AI through biometric verification, facial recognition, and digital identity systems.
Last action: Jan 24, 2025
HB 4705
Illinois Rep. Abdelnasser Rashid introduced HB 4705, which would require state agencies using artificial intelligence to produce reports on how they deploy these systems. The bill is currently parked in the Rules Committee with no immediate compliance impact on private businesses.
Last action: Apr 5, 2024
SB 754
Illinois SB 754, introduced by Senators Julie Morrison and Bob Morgan, is a regulatory technology bill currently sitting in the Rules Committee. With no detailed description published and the bill re-referred to Rules (often a parking spot for stalled legislation), the specific AI provisions remain unclear, but the 'REGULATION-TECH' shorthand signals it targets how technology is regulated in the state.
Last action: Apr 28, 2023
Common questions
Frequently Asked Questions
What AI laws affect healthcare organizations in Indiana?
Indiana healthcare organizations face both federal and state AI bills targeting clinical decision support systems, AI-assisted diagnostics, patient data privacy, and telehealth. Federal bills like the proposed AI accountability acts would require bias testing and validation for any AI used in clinical settings. Indiana-specific bills address data governance and automated decision-making in healthcare. AI Law Tracker monitors all active bills and classifies their risk level for healthcare providers.
Do Indiana hospitals need to disclose AI use to patients?
Several pending bills at both the federal and state level would require healthcare providers to disclose when AI is involved in diagnostic or treatment decisions. While none have been enacted yet in Indiana, the trend is clear. Organizations should prepare disclosure processes now, especially for AI-assisted radiology, pathology, and clinical decision support tools.
How should healthcare companies prepare for AI regulation?
Start by inventorying all AI tools used in patient-facing workflows. Document how each tool factors into clinical decisions, what data it accesses, and whether a human reviews its outputs. Establish a validation process for AI diagnostic tools and create disclosure templates for patients. These steps align with requirements in most pending healthcare AI legislation.
Need help with Indiana healthcare AI compliance?
Our team helps organizations build AI governance frameworks tailored to their industry and risk profile.
Talk to Our Team