Industry Impact
AI hiring laws affecting Indiana employers
Indiana employers using AI in hiring face some of the most active legislation in the country. Bills at the federal level and in the Indiana General Assembly target resume screening algorithms, automated interview analysis, employee monitoring, performance evaluation AI, and workforce analytics. If your Indiana business uses AI anywhere in the hiring pipeline or employee management, these bills apply to you, and multi-state hiring triggers laws from Illinois, Colorado, and New York as well.
36
Bills Affecting Indiana HR & Hiring
16
High Risk
Key Compliance Considerations
Indiana employers using automated employment decision tools may need bias audits before deployment under pending federal and state bills
Candidates in Indiana must be notified when AI is used in hiring decisions under several proposed bills at both levels
AI-driven performance monitoring used by Indiana businesses faces new transparency requirements in pending legislation
Resume screening algorithms used by Indiana companies must demonstrate they do not discriminate, with multi-state implications for companies hiring across borders
AI Bills Affecting Indiana HR & Hiring
HR 8094
Rep. Don Beyer (D-VA) introduced legislation requiring companies that develop or deploy large AI models (like GPT-4 or Claude) to publicly disclose detailed information about their AI systems. Companies would need to report training data sources, model capabilities, safety testing results, and energy consumption to a new federal registry within 90 days of deployment.
Last action: Mar 26, 2026
HR 7786
Representative Yvette Clarke introduced HR 7786 to make companies liable when their AI tools are used for fraud. If someone uses AI to create deepfakes, forge documents, or run scams, both the fraudster AND the AI company could face penalties unless the company took reasonable steps to prevent misuse.
Last action: Mar 4, 2026
S 3982
Senator Harris introduced S 3982 to make companies criminally liable when their AI systems are used to commit fraud, even if the company didn't intend the fraud. The bill closes a legal loophole where businesses could claim their AI acted independently, forcing companies to take responsibility for fraudulent outcomes from their automated systems.
Last action: Mar 4, 2026
S 3952
Senator Peters introduced a bill that would create new compliance requirements for companies using AI in high-stakes decisions like hiring, lending, healthcare, and criminal justice. Companies would need to conduct annual bias audits, implement human oversight systems, and publicly disclose when AI makes decisions affecting people's lives.
Last action: Feb 26, 2026
HB 1421
Indiana House Bill 1421 would completely ban employers from using automated decision systems (like AI hiring software, resume screening tools, or performance evaluation algorithms) to make employment decisions. The bill has just been introduced and sent to the Employment, Labor and Pensions Committee for review.
Last action: Jan 8, 2026
HR 6356
Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-NY) introduced legislation requiring companies to audit their AI systems for bias and discrimination before using them to make decisions about people. The bill would give individuals the right to know when AI makes decisions about them and to appeal those decisions to a human.
Last action: Dec 2, 2025
S 2938
Senator Cantwell introduced the Artificial Intelligence Risk Evaluation Act, which would require companies developing AI systems to conduct safety evaluations before release and report critical failures to the government. The bill creates a new federal office to oversee AI safety and gives regulators power to investigate AI incidents, similar to how the NTSB investigates plane crashes.
Last action: Sep 29, 2025
HR 5511
Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-NY) introduced legislation requiring companies to conduct impact assessments before deploying AI systems that could affect consumers. The bill would give the FTC power to enforce these assessments and create a public registry of high-impact AI systems, marking the first major federal attempt to regulate commercial AI use across industries.
Last action: Sep 19, 2025
HR 4695
Representative Ted Lieu introduced HR 4695 to restrict how companies and government agencies use facial recognition technology. The bill would require businesses to get explicit consent before scanning faces, ban certain uses like emotion detection in hiring, and give people the right to opt out of facial recognition systems.
Last action: Jul 23, 2025
S 2367
Senator Durbin introduced S 2367, which would require companies using AI for important decisions (like hiring, lending, or healthcare) to explain how their AI works and prove it doesn't discriminate. Companies would need to conduct regular audits of their AI systems, tell people when AI makes decisions about them, and let people opt out of certain AI decisions.
Last action: Jul 21, 2025
S 2164
Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) introduced the Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2025, which would require companies using AI and automated decision-making systems to conduct impact assessments and document how their algorithms work. The bill targets businesses using AI for critical decisions like hiring, lending, healthcare, and housing, forcing them to evaluate their systems for bias, discrimination, and privacy risks before deployment.
Last action: Jun 25, 2025
SB 150
Indiana's SB 150, now signed into law, requires companies using AI in high-stakes decisions (like hiring, lending, or healthcare) to conduct regular bias audits and provide clear explanations when AI affects people's lives. The law creates new compliance requirements for businesses using AI tools, with penalties for companies that don't properly test their systems or notify customers about AI use.
Last action: Mar 13, 2024
SB 5
Indiana's SB 5 creates comprehensive consumer data privacy rules similar to California's CCPA and Europe's GDPR. The law gives Indiana residents rights to access, delete, and opt out of the sale of their personal data, while requiring businesses that collect data from Indiana residents to implement specific privacy practices and safeguards.
Last action: May 1, 2023
HB 1563
Indiana HB 1563 would regulate how businesses and government agencies can use facial recognition software. Representative sponsors are pushing this bill through the Roads and Transportation Committee (an unusual committee assignment that may signal focus on transportation-related uses). The bill would likely create new restrictions and requirements for any organization using facial recognition technology in Indiana.
Last action: Jan 19, 2023
SB 358
Senator Freeman's SB 358 requires businesses to get explicit consent before using AI to analyze consumer data in Indiana. Companies would need to tell customers exactly how AI processes their information, let them opt out, and delete data on request. This brings GDPR-style data rights specifically to AI systems.
Last action: Feb 17, 2022
SB 576
Indiana's SB 576 would ban employers from using AI systems that scan faces or voices during hiring unless they tell candidates first and get written consent. The bill, currently in committee, creates new rules for any company using AI-powered video interviews or voice analysis tools to screen job applicants.
Last action: Jan 14, 2019
HR 8031
Representative Boebert introduced HR 8031 to repeal Biden's Executive Order on AI that established federal AI safety standards and oversight requirements. The bill would eliminate current federal AI governance frameworks, removing requirements for federal agencies to assess AI risks and for companies to report on their AI development activities.
Last action: Mar 20, 2026
S 4113
Senator Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) introduced the AI Guardrails Act to force federal agencies to set safety rules for AI systems before they can deploy them. The bill requires agencies to identify risks, establish testing procedures, and create ways to shut down AI systems that go wrong, with the Department of Defense and intelligence agencies mostly exempt.
Last action: Mar 17, 2026
S 4098
Senator Ted Budd (R-NC) introduced the Artificial Intelligence-Ready Data Act to create federal guidelines for how businesses prepare and manage data used in AI systems. The bill would establish new requirements for data quality, documentation, and transparency when companies use data to train or operate AI tools, affecting any business that develops or deploys AI systems.
Last action: Mar 16, 2026
HR 7576
Representatives Beyer and Obernolte introduced HR 7576 to create AI workforce training programs through tax credits. Companies that train workers in AI skills would get tax breaks, and the bill establishes government programs to help workers whose jobs are displaced by AI automation.
Last action: Feb 13, 2026
S 2937
Senator Thom Tillis introduced the AI LEAD Act to regulate how federal agencies use AI systems. The bill requires agencies to tell Congress before buying or using AI, sets up testing requirements to catch problems before deployment, and creates new oversight rules with real penalties if agencies mess up their AI implementations.
Last action: Sep 29, 2025
HR 4873
Rep. Jimmy Patronis (R-FL) introduced HR 4873 to turn Biden's Executive Order 14319 into permanent law, which requires federal agencies to avoid using AI systems that show bias based on race, gender, or other protected characteristics. The bill would make it illegal for any federal agency to use AI tools that discriminate in hiring, benefits distribution, or service delivery.
Last action: Aug 5, 2025
HR 4640
Rep. Greg Casar (D-TX) introduced this bill to ban companies from using AI algorithms to set prices or wages in ways that could amount to collusion or exploitation. It would treat algorithmic price-setting and wage-setting that uses competitor data as a form of illegal coordination, even without a traditional agreement between companies.
Last action: Jul 23, 2025
HR 3460
Rep. Jay Obernolte (R-CA) introduced this federal bill to protect employees at AI companies who report safety concerns or violations to the government. It would shield workers from retaliation (firing, demotion, harassment) when they blow the whistle on AI-related risks, similar to existing protections in finance and healthcare.
Last action: May 15, 2025
S 1792
Senator Chuck Grassley's bill would protect employees at AI companies who report safety risks, legal violations, or dangerous practices to the government or their employers. It bars AI developers from using non-disclosure agreements or retaliation to silence workers who raise concerns about AI systems.
Last action: May 15, 2025
HB 1554
HB 1554, introduced in Indiana, aims to protect consumer data privacy. The bill would likely create new requirements for businesses that collect and use personal data, similar to laws in other states like California and Virginia. Without the full bill text, specific requirements and scope remain unclear.
Last action: Jan 19, 2023
S 4476
Senator Mark Warner's bill creates a voluntary framework for AI developers and companies using AI to share data about how AI is affecting their workforce (think hiring, firing, task automation, and skill shifts). The Secretary of Labor would then compile and report this data to Congress and the public. Nothing here is mandatory, it's an opt-in disclosure program.
Last action: Apr 30, 2026
S 4414
Senator Adam Schiff's LIFT AI Act would direct the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to study AI literacy and workforce readiness across the U.S. economy. It does not create new rules for businesses; it sets up federal research and recommendations on closing the AI skills gap.
Last action: Apr 28, 2026
HR 8516
Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA) introduced this bill to position the U.S. as the global leader in AI development through federal investment in research, workforce training, and public-private partnerships. It's primarily a strategic and funding bill, not a regulatory crackdown, focused on boosting American AI competitiveness rather than restricting how companies use AI.
Last action: Apr 27, 2026
S 4216
Senator Brian Schatz (D-HI) introduced a bill to repeal President Biden's Executive Order on AI, which currently requires federal agencies to develop AI safety standards and companies to share AI safety test results with the government. This would eliminate federal AI oversight requirements that the Executive Order put in place.
Last action: Mar 26, 2026
HR 3679
Rep. Mike Collins (R-GA) introduced this bill to help small businesses adopt AI tools through education, training, and resources via the Small Business Administration. It directs the SBA to create programs that teach small business owners how to use AI responsibly and competitively, rather than imposing new restrictions or compliance burdens.
Last action: Feb 24, 2026
HR 7158
Rep. Valerie Foushee (D-NC) introduced this bill to expand participation in AI research and development by directing federal funding toward Historically Black Colleges and Universities, Hispanic-Serving Institutions, and other minority-serving institutions. It aims to diversify the AI workforce and research pipeline rather than regulate how companies use AI. Currently sitting in the House Science Committee.
Last action: Jan 20, 2026
HR 6573
Rep. Sara Jacobs (D-CA) introduced this bill to help the federal government recruit and retain AI talent by creating new hiring pathways and training programs for AI specialists in federal agencies. It focuses on building government AI expertise rather than regulating private sector AI use.
Last action: Dec 10, 2025
HR 5584
Rep. Thomas Kean's LIFT AI Act directs federal agencies (likely NIST and related bodies) to study and support AI workforce development and adoption, focusing on training and capacity-building rather than restricting AI use. It's currently sitting in the House Science Committee with no compliance mandates for private businesses.
Last action: Sep 26, 2025
HR 3210
Representative Adriano Espaillat (D-NY) introduced this bill to boost AI literacy and inclusion across the US workforce, likely through education programs, grants, and training initiatives targeting underrepresented communities. It's currently sitting in multiple House committees, including Science, Education, and Small Business, and focuses on building AI skills rather than regulating AI use.
Last action: May 6, 2025
S 1290
Senator Gary Peters (D-MI) introduced a bill requiring the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to create a standardized framework for AI workforce roles and skills. The bill would establish official job titles, required competencies, and career pathways for AI professionals across government and industry, similar to existing frameworks for cybersecurity roles.
Last action: Apr 3, 2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What AI hiring laws apply to Indiana employers?
Indiana employers are affected by multiple AI hiring bills at both the federal and state level. The Illinois AI Video Interview Act already applies to any company interviewing Illinois candidates. Colorado's AI Act (enforcement 2026) covers automated employment decisions. Federal bills propose nationwide bias audit requirements for AI hiring tools. Even if your business is based in Indiana, hiring across state lines triggers these laws.
Do I need a bias audit for my AI recruiting tools?
If you use AI for resume screening, candidate ranking, automated interviews, or hiring decisions, multiple pending bills would require independent bias audits. New York City's Local Law 144 (already in effect) requires annual audits for automated employment decision tools used on NYC candidates. Similar requirements are proposed at the federal level. Proactively auditing now reduces risk regardless of which bills pass.
What should Indiana companies do about AI in hiring?
First, inventory every AI tool in your hiring pipeline, from job posting optimization to resume screening to interview scheduling. Second, ensure candidates are notified when AI is used. Third, maintain human oversight on final hiring decisions. Fourth, document your process so you can demonstrate compliance when legislation takes effect. These steps align with the common requirements across all pending AI hiring bills.
Need help with Indiana hr & hiring AI compliance?
Our team helps organizations build AI governance frameworks tailored to their industry and risk profile.
Talk to Our Team